The riscv target incorrectly enabled semihosting always, whether the
user asked for it or not. Call semihosting_enabled() passing the
correct value to the is_userspace argument, which fixes this and also
handles the userspace=on argument. Because we do this at translate
time, we no longer need to check the privilege level in
riscv_cpu_do_interrupt().
Note that this is a behaviour change: we used to default to
semihosting being enabled, and now the user must pass
"-semihosting-config enable=on" if they want it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20220822141230.3658237-8-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Qemu virt machine can support few cache events and cycle/instret counters.
It also supports counter overflow for these events.
Add a DT node so that OpenSBI/Linux kernel is aware of the virt machine
capabilities. There are some dummy nodes added for testing as well.
Acked-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Message-Id: <20220824221701.41932-5-atishp@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
All the hpmcounters and the fixed counters (CY, IR, TM) can be represented
as a unified counter. Thus, the predicate function doesn't need handle each
case separately.
Simplify the predicate function so that we just handle things differently
between RV32/RV64 and S/HS mode.
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Message-Id: <20220824221701.41932-3-atishp@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
The Sscofpmf ('Ss' for Privileged arch and Supervisor-level extensions,
and 'cofpmf' for Count OverFlow and Privilege Mode Filtering)
extension allows the perf to handle overflow interrupts and filtering
support. This patch provides a framework for programmable
counters to leverage the extension. As the extension doesn't have any
provision for the overflow bit for fixed counters, the fixed events
can also be monitoring using programmable counters. The underlying
counters for cycle and instruction counters are always running. Thus,
a separate timer device is programmed to handle the overflow.
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Message-Id: <20220824221701.41932-2-atishp@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
vstimecmp CSR allows the guest OS or to program the next guest timer
interrupt directly. Thus, hypervisor no longer need to inject the
timer interrupt to the guest if vstimecmp is used. This was ratified
as a part of the Sstc extension.
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Message-Id: <20220824221357.41070-4-atishp@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Normally, riscv_csrrw_check is called when executing Zicsr instructions.
And we can only do access control for existed CSRs. So the priority of
CSR related check, from highest to lowest, should be as follows:
1) check whether Zicsr is supported: raise RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST if not
2) check whether csr is existed: raise RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST if not
3) do access control: raise RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST or RISCV_EXCP_VIRT_
INSTRUCTION_FAULT if not allowed
The predicates contain parts of function of both 2) and 3), So they need
to be placed in the middle of riscv_csrrw_check
Signed-off-by: Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>
Signed-off-by: Junqiang Wang <wangjunqiang@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20220803123652.3700-1-liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
According to v-spec, mask agnostic behavior can be either kept as
undisturbed or set elements' bits to all 1s. To distinguish the
difference of mask policies, QEMU should be able to simulate the mask
agnostic behavior as "set mask elements' bits to all 1s".
There are multiple possibility for agnostic elements according to
v-spec. The main intent of this patch-set tries to add option that
can distinguish between mask policies. Setting agnostic elements to
all 1s allows QEMU to express this.
This commit adds option 'rvv_ma_all_1s' is added to enable the
behavior, it is default as disabled.
Signed-off-by: eop Chen <eop.chen@sifive.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
Reviewed-by: Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <165570784143.17634.35095816584573691-10@git.sr.ht>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
According to v-spec, mask agnostic behavior can be either kept as
undisturbed or set elements' bits to all 1s. To distinguish the
difference of mask policies, QEMU should be able to simulate the mask
agnostic behavior as "set mask elements' bits to all 1s".
There are multiple possibility for agnostic elements according to
v-spec. The main intent of this patch-set tries to add option that
can distinguish between mask policies. Setting agnostic elements to
all 1s allows QEMU to express this.
This is the first commit regarding the optional mask agnostic
behavior. Follow-up commits will add this optional behavior
for all rvv instructions.
Signed-off-by: eop Chen <eop.chen@sifive.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
Reviewed-by: Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <165570784143.17634.35095816584573691-1@git.sr.ht>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Just add 1 to the effective privledge level when in HS mode, then reuse
the check of 'effective_priv < csr_priv' in riscv_csrrw_check to replace
the privilege level related check in hmode. Then, hmode will only check
whether H extension is supported.
When accessing Hypervior CSRs:
1) If accessing from M privilege level, the check of
'effective_priv< csr_priv' passes, returns hmode(...) which will return
RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST when H extension is not supported and return
RISCV_EXCP_NONE otherwise.
2) If accessing from HS privilege level, effective_priv will add 1,
the check passes and also returns hmode(...) too.
3) If accessing from VS/VU privilege level, the check fails, and
returns RISCV_EXCP_VIRT_INSTRUCTION_FAULT
4) If accessing from U privilege level, the check fails, and returns
RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST
Signed-off-by: Weiwei Li <liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>
Signed-off-by: Junqiang Wang <wangjunqiang@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Message-Id: <20220718130955.11899-7-liweiwei@iscas.ac.cn>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Pass these along to translator_loop -- pc may be used instead
of tb->pc, and host_pc is currently unused. Adjust all targets
at one time.
Acked-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
We got to talking about how Zmmul and M interact with each other
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/issues/869 , and it turns out
that QEMU's behavior is slightly wrong: having Zmmul and M is a legal
combination, it just means that the multiplication instructions are
supported even when M is disabled at runtime via misa.
This just stops overriding M from Zmmul, with that the other checks for
the multiplication instructions work as per the ISA.
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20220714180033.22385-1-palmer@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
The latest AIA draft v0.3.0 defines a relatively simpler scheme for
default priority assignments where:
1) local interrupts 24 to 31 and 48 to 63 are reserved for custom use
and have implementation specific default priority.
2) remaining local interrupts 0 to 23 and 32 to 47 have a recommended
(not mandatory) priority assignments.
We update the default priority table and hviprio mapping as-per above.
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20220616031543.953776-3-apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Based on architecture review committee feedback, the [m|s|vs]seteienum,
[m|s|vs]clreienum, [m|s|vs]seteipnum, and [m|s|vs]clreipnum CSRs are
removed in the latest AIA draft v0.3.0 specification.
(Refer, https://github.com/riscv/riscv-aia/releases/tag/0.3.0-draft.31)
These CSRs were mostly for software convenience and software can always
use [m|s|vs]iselect and [m|s|vs]ireg CSRs to update the IMSIC interrupt
file bits.
We update the IMSIC CSR emulation as-per above to match the latest AIA
draft specification.
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Message-Id: <20220616031543.953776-2-apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
The riscv_cpu_realize() sets priv spec version to v1.12 when it is
when "env->priv_ver == 0" (i.e. default v1.10) because the enum
value of priv spec v1.10 is zero.
Due to above issue, the sifive_u machine will see priv spec v1.12
instead of priv spec v1.10.
To fix this issue, we set latest priv spec version (i.e. v1.12)
for base rv64/rv32 cpu and riscv_cpu_realize() will override priv
spec version only when "cpu->cfg.priv_spec != NULL".
Fixes: 7100fe6c24 ("target/riscv: Enable privileged spec version 1.12")
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220611080107.391981-2-apatel@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
mcycle/minstret are actually WARL registers and can be written with any
given value. With SBI PMU extension, it will be used to store a initial
value provided from supervisor OS. The Qemu also need prohibit the counter
increment if mcountinhibit is set.
Support mcycle/minstret through generic counter infrastructure.
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Message-Id: <20220620231603.2547260-8-atishp@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
The RISC-V privilege specification provides flexibility to implement
any number of counters from 29 programmable counters. However, the QEMU
implements all the counters.
Make it configurable through pmu config parameter which now will indicate
how many programmable counters should be implemented by the cpu.
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Message-Id: <20220620231603.2547260-5-atishp@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Peter Maydell
Atish Patra
Atish Patra
Anup Patel
Rahul Pathak
Weiwei Li
Dao Lu
eopXD
Alexey Baturo
Frédéric Pétrot
Richard Henderson
Paolo Bonzini
Palmer Dabbelt
Alistair Francis